The move
Everyone votes on a question, partners who chose differently try to convince each other, and then everyone votes again.
See how it works
At a glance
- Time in class
- 5–8 minutes
- Prep
- 2 minutes: write one multiple-choice question.
- Materials
- None. Students vote with fingers.
- Grouping
- Individual vote, then pairs.
- Use it when
- You’ve just taught a concept and want to know if it stuck before moving on.
Why it works
Explaining your answer to someone who disagrees forces you to check your own reasoning. In classes that use this routine (called peer instruction), the number of correct answers usually goes up after partners talk, even when only a few students were right at first.
Step by step
In class: about 4–6 min
- 2Ask30 seconds
- 3Vote 130 seconds
- 4Convince2 minutes
- 5Vote 230 seconds
- 6Reveal1–2 minutes
Before class: Write the question
- Write the question2 minutes, before classGive it 3–4 answer choices. Make the wrong choices tempting: use the mistakes students usually make.
- Ask30 seconds“Think on your own. No talking yet.”
- Vote 130 seconds“Hold up 1, 2, 3 or 4 fingers against your chest so only I can see.”Note the spread, but don’t reveal the answer.
- Convince2 minutes“Find someone who voted differently. You have two minutes to change their mind, or let them change yours.”
- Vote 230 secondsSame finger vote.
- Reveal1–2 minutesGive the answer and ask a student who switched: “What changed your mind?”
Quick rule: if nearly everyone is right on vote 1, skip the discussion and move on. If nearly everyone is wrong, reteach before voting again.
See it in action
“Which weighs more: a pound of feathers or a pound of rocks?”
Science: “In a vacuum, which hits the ground first: a feather or a hammer?”
Ela: “Which of these best explains the narrator’s main motive?” with four quotes as choices.
Watch out for
- Students copying the loudest voice: keep votes hidden against the chest.
- Nobody disagrees: pair students with someone who voted differently, or ask partners to argue for the answer they didn’t pick.
- Question too easy: if everyone’s right on vote 1, the next question needs a more tempting wrong answer.
Level up
- Students explain what changed their mind.
- Students write the next vote question, including one tricky wrong answer.
Make it work for everyone
- Multilingual learners: post sentence starters: “I chose ___ because ___.” “I changed my mind when ___.”
- IEP and 504 supports: let students point to A/B/C/D cards instead of holding up fingers, and allow a partner to read the choices aloud.
- Early finishers: write a new wrong answer that would fool most of the class.
Tech option
Any polling tool works for the two votes, such as Google Forms or a live poll. Finger votes are faster and need no devices.
Resources
Printables
Optional: A/B/C/D answer cards.
Pairs well with
Reflect
Which wrong answer was most popular on vote 1? That misconception is worth a few minutes tomorrow.
Evidence
StrongCrouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970–977. Ten years of classroom data showing gains in conceptual understanding with peer instruction.
Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323(5910), 122–124. Discussion with peers improved understanding, even when no one in the pair knew the answer at first.
Find the research: Crouch (2001) · Smith (2009)
